Tate Modern:
Bruce Nauman
On 17th November 2017, I was, like a moth, instantly attracted to the bright lights of the Bruce Nauman exhibition (Tate Modern). His work demanded the viewer to (literally) take a step back and consider the purpose and context of his work. Nauman's extensive and imaginative use of media transmits a multitude of different ideas simultaneously. It is clear that his previous studies in Mathematics and Physics informed his practice and are a domineering influence on his work. One piece which caught my attention was 'Violins, Violence, Silence' (1981).
​
​
​
​
​
​
Violins, Violence, Silence
1981
Bruce Nauman
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
The artwork itself was made of coloured neon tubing with a clear glass suspension frame. As the letters overlap, it is hard to initially distinguish what the piece is actually conveying, proving rather disorientating. Additionally, the buzzing noise which accompanies the piece (originating from the neon tubing) is somewhat distracting. However, it is ironic that while reading 'violins' evokes a pure and unpolluted noise, in reality you are faced with a low, droning buzz. I enjoy the irony of Nauman's work and the complex ideas which lie behind the lights. There is much more to this piece than is initially apparent and I hope that other visitors to the gallery take the time to consider its complexity.
​
Another piece in the exhibition which caught my attention was 'Raw Material Washing Hands'(1996). The video, which documents one individual washing their hands constantly for 55 minutes is difficult viewing. It is reminiscent of a person suffering from obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) in which the individual is performing a routine repeatedly, as though it were a ritual. The video becomes painful to watch as we see the individuals skin being overworked by the soap and water and I must admit that although the video runs for just under an hour, I watched it for no longer than 10 minutes.
​
​
​
​
Raw Material Washing Hands,
Bruce Nauman
1996
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
After seeing Nauman's work, it is clear that he questions and stretches the boundaries of what it is to make art. He has purposefully left behind traditional notions of 'fine art' and has distanced himself from paint as a medium.
An Unknown Medieval Object
Fig. 43 Fig. 44
​
​
Fig. 45
​
​
​
Figure 43 was submitted to the Portable Antiquities Scheme and they said it was nothing but stone. I was not happy with this, as the object clearly appeared to have a worn arc and one straight side, so it was kept. The next season’s dig produced Figure 44 at the same medieval level and lo-and-behold the pieces joined (Fig. 45). It was then resubmitted to the Portable Antiquities Scheme and I will provide the full description in the hope that someone knows what it is: ‘Unidentified object, perhaps a floor tile or wet stone. Sandstone or quartzite, rectangular-sectioned, two long sides forming a right-angle, two short (and perhaps broken) sides, the fifth side deeply concave. The concave edge and one face are very smooth as if worn. Broken relatively recently, now in two conjoining pieces. Despite the suggestive shape it seems unlikely to be a tile cut to fit around a curved edge as the edge is so well smoothed. Measuring 95 x 95mm. 18mm thick at maximum.’ I dispute the suggestion that it was broken recently.
​
​
​
Some Pre-Medieval Finds That Have Helped Inform My Practice
​
​
The term ‘Medieval Period’ can sometimes refer to Pre-Conquest and takes into account the period after the Romans left Britain in the early 5th Century, up to the Norman Kings, and beyond to the Tudors. For me, ‘Medieval’ refers to the period after the Norman invasion of 1066 and ends with the death of Richard III in 1485.
Some finds in the dig pre-date my definition of the medieval period, yet still have much to contribute to my art practice. Below are a few examples of what we have found that are important to me, for they contribute to those ‘Ah!’ moments.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Fig. 46
Large fragment of Thetford ware storage jar rim with potter’s thumb mark (bottom right) (10th-12th C.)
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Fig. 47
​
The same large fragment of Thetford ware as Figure 46 from the top of the rim showing three finger impressions, as decoration, on the inner rim (10th-12th C.). These jars were massive and the finger decoration would have encompassed the entire circumference of the rim.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Fig. 48 Fig. 49
Thetford ware jar rim sherd (11th-12th C.) Thetford ware cooking pot rim sherd
showing exposure to cooking (11-12th C)
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Fig. 50 Fig. 51 Fig. 52
​
Three examples of rouletting (using a wheel carved with geometric patterns) on Saxon Thetford ware pottery (9th-11th C.). It is nice to think that even in those dark, harsh times, effort was spent in decorating simple, everyday ware.
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Fig. 53 Fig. 54
​
​
Iron Age pottery bowl sherd (800-100 B.C.) showing a heavily flint tempered outer (Fig. 53) and inner (Fig. 54) rim, respectively. Flint was added to the clay to give stability when throwing and firing (in the medieval period crushed shell was used, as it required a lower firing temperature – under 850C). This piece of pottery just emanates the Iron Age period for me.
​
​
​
​
​
​